A DICTIONARY OF LAW

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Old-Fashioned DUI & Liquor Legislation Repealed in Utah

Every state gets to choose the components of its own criminal code, although some alcohol-related laws have federal roots. For instance, every state raised its legal drinking age to 21 and lowered the blood alcohol content at which a driver is presumed impaired to 0.08 percent at federal urging through strings attached to highway funding, according to Fort Lauderdale DUI lawyer William Moore. Utah, however, has some particularly stringent laws, which have gone hand in hand which the voter’s comparatively strict views of alcohol consumption. The state has elected to change some of its laws recently, however, in light of new times and the troubled economy.

One of the more famous relics of drinking in Utah is the so-called Zion Curtain, a piece of green fabric that serves as a partition between the bar, where drinks are poured and mixed, and the eating area in restaurants. That requirement, along with many others, will be lifted in May of this year. The requirement that establishments that sell liquor must operate as private clubs – with membership fees – will also be dropped. Tourism advocates in the state believe the harsh liquor laws are stunting potential funds. Broward DUI lawyer Moore agrees that the legislation could stave off carefree vacationers. Each individual bar requires a membership, so even locals are unlikely to go bar-hopping on the weekends, and a membership is required to go into the bar – not just to drink. A one-year membership at a Utah bar costs a minimum of $12. Nonetheless, there are ways to bring in guests with a temporary membership, so locals and tourists alike frequently share temporary three-week memberships.

Utah currently brings in about $6 billion annually from tourism, leading the proponents of lifting the liquor restrictions to believe that the changes could raise the profits or at least maintain them during tough economic times. Alcohol policy in Utah has typically been more conservative than in other U.S. states, including neighboring Western party destination Nevada. Nonetheless, tourists are attracted to Salt Lake City and the scenic national parks in the state. Perhaps the largest attraction is the Sundance Film Festival, hosted annually in Park City, Utah.

Florida’s tourism industry is about 10 times larger than Utah’s, at close to $60 billion. The state’s reputation as a beach vacation spot and a great party destination for spring break have fueled the tourism and hospitality industries. Beachside bars and restaurants, in particular, reap the benefits of the travelers in the spring months, as well as the part-time residents during the winter. Florida alcohol policy is currently in line with national trends, with comparable DUI laws and liquor sales requirements.

The Role of Alcoholism in DUIs

Alcoholism is frequently described as both a disease and an addiction. Alcoholics continue drinking, despite the often intensely negative consequences: convictions for driving under the influence, loss of employment, and estrangement from family members. For some, even becoming homeless is not enough to make them quit drinking, although the degree of consequences – and what constitutes “rock bottom” – varies significantly from one alcoholic to another.

The fact that a person is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol does not mean that he or she is an alcoholic, according to Broward DUI lawyer William Moore.. If the charges are correct and the person is subsequently convicted, the court will frequently order the defendant to complete DUI school and alcohol abuse treatment. Unfortunately, Broward DUI attorney Moore has found that many families of DUI defendants become alarmed and assume that a DUI arrest necessarily means that the defendant was an alcoholic – even if he had previously gone undetected. In reality, driving under the influence of alcohol can be a symptom of alcoholism, but a single DUI does not mean that the driver has an ongoing problem with alcohol. It can also mean that the person made an error. It is fairly common for first-time DUI defendants never to have another criminal problem again.

Symptoms of alcoholism vary. Some people becoming “functioning alcoholics,” where they continue with their employment and present a healthy face to the outside world. For others, their lives obviously deteriorate, and they may have many arrests – DUIs, public intoxication, and other matters stemming from the abuse. Long-term alcoholism can result In deteriorating mental condition, including alcohol-related dementia. In fact, alcoholism is the second-highest cause of dementia. Alcohol is also tied to major depression and certain forms of psychosis. From a social standpoint, divorce is a common effect, as alcoholics frequently have difficulty maintaining their marriages. Loss of employment is another serious problem alcoholics fact. In the same vein, homelessness is frequently associated with substance abuse (in addition to factors such as mental illness). One of the worst problems with alcohol abuse for women is the possibility of fetal alcohol syndrome as a result of alcohol consumption during pregnancy, which can cause significant physical and mental defects. Despite these problems, Fort Lauderdale DUI lawyer

William Moore believes that many DUIs are not the result of long-term alcohol abuse.

Driving Under the Influence – An International Perspective from Fort Lauderdale DUI Lawyer Moore

North American countries tend to designate people as too impaired to operate a motor vehicle at a higher blood alcohol concentration when compared to other parts of the world. Although it is always illegal to drive while impaired in Florida, regardless of your BAC, the impairment is presumed when your BAC reaches 0.08 percent. At that point, a prosecutor will only have to prove that was your reading on a properly functioning, correctly administered breath alcohol

measuring device (the Intoxilyzer, known as a breathalyzer) or based on a sample of your blood.

West Palm Beach DUI lawyer William Moore notes that a BAC of 0.08 percent or higher is the level at which impairment is presumed under Florida DUI laws and all U.S. states. Canadian law maintains a fairly similar DUI system, with a 0.08 percent as the “legal limit” and a mandatory period of at least 30 days in jail for the second conviction. Likewise, 0.08 percent is the legal limit in Mexico and most of Central America, including Panama, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Belize. At 0.05 percent and 0.075 percent respectively, El Salvador and Costa Rica have stricter DUI laws.

Like many aspects of government and legislation, laws against driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs are heavily regional, reflecting the way of life and values of people in different areas in the world. South American countries have a number of lower, although more variable, limits for BAC while driving. They range from 0.01 percent in Guyana and up to 0.02 percent in Brazil to 0.08 percent in Uruguay, Suriname, and Paraguay.

European nations have traditionally taken a harder line on drunk driving, according to Palm Beach DUI attorney Moore, who thinks that most Europeans would be surprised by the relative lenience of a 0.08 BAC for driving. A number of Central and Eastern European countries have enacted zero-tolerance DUI laws, where there is no acceptable limit of alcohol in one’s bloodstream when driving, although some apply only to new drivers (i.e., people who have had a driver’s license for less than two years). The United Kingdom and Ireland are outliers at 0.08 percent, while Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands have limits of 0.05 percent, the most common level in Western Europe.

Below, a short lesson on French wine – but be careful not to drive after indulging in too much:

Recent DUI News in Florida

West Palm Beach DUI lawyer William Moore follows the latest drunk driving news stories around the state. A few of recent newsworthy cases have caught his attention.

A Longwood, Florida man was convicted last month of three DUI manslaughter charges. Carlos Ortiz attempted to pass another vehicle by using the emergency lane, but smashed into another vehicle parked on the highway near Viera at about 11:40 in the morning on July 1, 2007. A young couple, Jacqueline Dieppa, 33, Alexis Rodriguez, also 33, and their two-year-old son Nayib Suarez, were killed in the accident. Ortiz was sentenced to three life terms in prison, one for each of their deaths. Before Ortiz’s vehicle crashed, three different motorists had contacted police regarding his unsafe driving, including speeding and passing in the emergency lane. Crispy, the family dog, also died as a result of the accident. The family had parked to wait for relatives they planned to meet at the beach.

According to law enforcement officials, the family was killed instantly in the crash, when Ortiz’s car hit theirs at 77 miles per hour. Prosecutors say his blood alcohol concentration was 0.176 percent, more than twice the level at which Florida law presumes a driver is impaired. The State Attorney’s Office argued that Ortiz should receive the life sentences due in part to his prior convictions for two armed robberies, although one of those occurred when he was a juvenile.

Another high-profile DUI manslaughter case came out of Gainesville this week. Amanda Boyd, who is 23, has been charged with DUI manslaughter following a fatal accident on September 21, 2008. Investigators allege that Boyd’s truck went over the curb, crashing hard into another car at the intersection. The woman driving the other vehicle, Betty Ruth Hinson, was 74 years old. She was pronounced dead at the scene of the accident on University Avenue. Hinson was on her way to pick up a friend so that they could attend an evening church service.

Palm Beach DUI lawyer Moore says that investigators determined that Boyd’s truck was going 54 miles per hour at the time of the impact, although Boyd was traveling faster prior to hitting the brakes to avoid the collision. A blood test revealed that Boyd’s BAC was .210 thirty minutes after the accident. Boyd told law enforcement officials that she had consumed just one beer before driving. A trial date has not yet been set in the DUI manslaughter case.

Miami DUI Manslaughter -- Donte Stallworth Surrenders to Miami Beach Police

Donte Stallworth, the wide receiver for the professional football team the Cleveland Browns, has surrendered to law enforcement officials. Stallworth has been charged with DUI Manslaughter as a result of an accident on March 14 that occurred on the causeway that connects Miami and Miami Beach. Miami DUI lawyer William Moore extends his condolences to the victim’s family and reminds tourists and other South Beach partygoers to drink responsibly.

According to law enforcement officials, Stallworth was driving his 2005 Bentley back to Miami at about 7:00 a.m. after a night of partying till dawn at the swanky Fontainebleau hotel. Mario Reyes, a local Miami resident, was getting off of work. He was a night-shift crane operator. Reyes was crossing the street on the causeway to get to the bus stop to go home when Stallworth was driving on the same road. Stallworth struck fatally struck Reyes. News media outlets have reported that Reyes was not in the crosswalk at the time of the accident. Stallworth stayed at the scene of the accident and was reportedly cooperative with police, telling them, “I’m the driver of that car…I hit the man lying in the road.” Police believe that Stallworth’s vehicle was traveling at about 50 miles per hour in an area with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Stallworth’s blood alcohol concentration was measured at 0.126 percent, above the 0.08 percent at which Florida state law presumes a driver’s faculties are impaired.

Stallworth was charged with DUI Manslaughter in the death earlier this week. Stallworth surrendered, appearing in court and posting bail of $200,000. He was accompanied to court by his mother, Donna, and made a statement to the press expressing his deep condolences to the Reyes family and that the has “full faith and confidence in the legal process.” His DUI defense attorney said that the crash was a “tragic accident” and that “there are no winners here,” with regard to his client’s defense.

While he is out on bail, Stallworth will not be permitted to consume alcohol or drive. He will be permitted to travel between Cleveland and Miami, but must seek approval for any other travel. According to Broward DUI lawyer Moore, such restrictions are common.

Stallworth rose to fame playing college football for Tennessee. Before signing a $35 million contract with the Cleveland Browns, he played for three other NFL teams. He has been plagued by injuries in recent months.

What is a Lawyer?


Lawyers interpret the law through actions and words for the protection of an individual, a business concern or an idea. They must be widely versed in a great many areas: the law, economics, history, human motivation and behavior, and the practicalities of day to day living. The education of lawyers never ends because they must constantly be abreast of information which may be of use to the client.

As our society grows in complexity, the lawyer's role grows as well. No longer is it possible for one single lawyer to handle every aspect of every client's legal needs. Although well informed as to the tax implications of stock market transactions, a lawyer may not know enough to cover adequately the client's requirements for divorce proceedings, for instance. For this reason, the vast majority of today's lawyers are specifying the types of clients and cases which they will serve. It is important to understand, however, that even though the legal profession itself is specializing, the law school and prelegal education remain general in nature. Any specialization you choose to follow must take place after you graduate from law school, pass the bar examination, and enter the professional world. The type you choose to practice may depend upon employment conditions when you begin, your personal interest and background, the amount of money you want to earn, the area of the country in which you want to live, etc. If you enjoy working with numbers or have a great concern for the welfare of society, you're a natural for some particular legal specialties; see descriptions below.

So how can you know if you'll like being a lawyer? The practice of law includes so many alternatives that it is difficult to generalize at all. Many lawyers in large corporate firms concentrate their efforts in mastering one particular area of specialization within the law, e.g. the intricacies of tax law. These attorneys often serve primarily as advisors to corporate clients, rarely being involved with taking a case to court. Litigation lawyers, on the other hand, prepare and present cases in court or negotiate to settle the case before the scheduled court appearance. Practicing law in a small town or with a small community-based firm often means taking whatever cases walk through the door. This kind of practice tends to focus more on the daily legal needs of individuals - drawing up wills or deeds, filing for divorces, getting someone out of jail on bond, settling personal damage suits in court - rather than the more technical and specialized needs of corporate clients. Success is often due more to the quality of your personal interactions and persuasiveness than to your intellectual capabilities.

Although various kinds of legal practice are different in many ways, there are some common links. First of all, clients come to lawyers with a certain set of facts - the specific details of their experience. They come seeking a remedy. Your task as the attorney is to use your skills and understanding of the law to support their cases. Clients tend not to concern themselves with theory although you may think cases pose some interesting issues. They want you to take the facts - their facts - and weave the details into a case to support their position. Your success as a lawyer is determined by the extent to which you serve the best interests of your clients. Your satisfaction in a legal career is also in part determined by the extent to which you like the interests and clients you serve.

It is impossible to list and explain all of the various types of law practiced in the United States today. The following descriptions cover the legal fields most widely known and available to beginning lawyers. Most law schools have very sophisticated methods with which to assist you in finding appropriate employment opportunities. Your law school placement office will be able to give you more complete information when you need it. The following descriptions are presented only to give you an idea of what some types of lawyers do. You should also be aware that some of the descriptions given here may fit other titles as it is often difficult to differentiate between types of law which may overlap a great deal, i.e. what is entitled comparative law here may be considered international law by some. You must also realize that the descriptions are only brief summaries and do not cover everything that the lawyer working in that specialty does.

Comparative Law

A lawyer who chooses this specialty must have a good working knowledge of the laws, society, and government of at least one country other than the United States. This usually means that the lawyer has attended both college and law school in the United States as well as a formal educational institution in the foreign country with whose affairs s/he will eventually work. The comparative lawyer works with international relations in trade and commerce, travel, government business, and many other areas depending upon the breadth of his/her knowledge and the needs of his/her employer. The field of comparative law is one in which there is a great deal of opportunity for advancement and challenging work. Comparative lawyers may find their employment with business firms, with government organizations, or with any person or group which deals with countries other than the United States.

Environmental Law

One of the newest entries in the legal world, environmental law requires a concern for the nation's resources, knowledge of where the resources are, what they are used for, how and why they may be endangered or exploited, and whose job it is to protect them. Environmental lawyers may work alone or in and for groups whose job it is to prosecute offenders and remedy the offending situation. On the other side of the coin, environmental lawyers may represent the "offenders" to prove why the exploitation is not bad or is not what it seems to be. Finally, they may mediate between concerned groups and help generate arrangements which will benefit the country, the consumers, and the corporation.

Patent Law

Patent Law is the only legal specialty officially recognized by the American Bar Association. It is also one of the few areas of legal practice which requires a specific educational background usually in the natural sciences, mathematics, or engineering. This background is required because the work a patent lawyer does is to see that no one has already patented a client's idea and that no one "borrows" the client's idea after it has been patented. To do this the lawyer must thoroughly understand the client's idea and be able to ascertain whether differences occur in similar ideas or if, indeed, the idea has already been used or is being "borrowed". Patent lawyers are usually employed by large firms whose research teams may constantly be coming up with new ideas to be protected, or by large law firms where they handle individual clients and companies who seek the advice of the lawyer. Sometimes patent lawyers enter private practice and work as representatives to individuals and companies.

Poverty Law and Legal Services

A general title for a great number of legal opportunities, poverty law and legal services offers a lawyer the chance to represent and protect those in our society who may not have the money or the knowledge to help themselves. Many law schools are now offering third year students and occasionally second year students the option of working with poverty law clients as part of an internship or clinical program. If your law school offers this as an elective, it is not only an excellent method of acquainting yourself with the real "meat" of this particular type of law practice, it is also a fine introduction into the legal world itself as it shows the student the kind of knowledge s/he will be called upon to utilize every day. In addition, it serves as a respite from what may become academic tedium during the later years of law school. Poverty law and legal services encompass positions such as the district attorney and public defenders in city governments, legal aid work, and government groups such as VISTA and the Peace Corps which have recently introduced legal work into their programs of assistance. If you are considering this type of law, do not expect to make a lot of money, expect to be very busy, and realize that your services will be sought by many and may be appreciated by only a few. For the vast majority of the lawyers who enter this type of law, the clients' appreciation when it occurs is the finest reward.

Tax Law

A tax lawyer assists people or businesses in the computation and payment of taxes of all kinds: income, property, estate, etc. A good background in statistics, mathematics and/or business as well as a genuine enjoyment of working with numbers are basic necessities for the tax lawyer. LLM degrees (the Master of Law Letters degree which follows the JD or LLB degree) can be received in tax law in a number of law school graduate divisions around the country. This is one of the specific areas in which the LLM degree is most frequently pursued. Tax law is a growing field because of the increasing complexity of the financial status of the United States and its private citizens. If you satisfy the requirements of the field, your work in private practice or as a corporation tax lawyer can be a lucrative career. Corporate Law The corporate lawyer deals with the entirety of a corporation's activities from settling tax, employment, or labor problems, to setting up mergers between and among corporations and arranging stock options. Generally, a corporate lawyer is one of a team of lawyers, each handling or assisting in the handling of only one of the activities areas. A corporate lawyer, therefore, may be any one of the preceding types of lawyers and also be a corporate lawyer. For instance, an environmental lawyer may be employed by Kodak and still retain both titles of environmental and corporate lawyer; one does not preclude the other. Corporate law opportunities are unlimited and offer continually broadening horizons commensurate with the growth of the corporation.

Criminal Law

Criminal Law involves just what the label implies: persons accused of crimes. Lawyers who specialize in criminal law may work on either side of the adversary process -- defense or prosecution. Those who defend the accused may work in private practice or in a public defender's office. Those who work for the prosecution side will generally be employed by the government, e.g. in District Attorneys' offices, etc. At the higher levels of government (e.g. the Federal Justice Department), criminal lawyers will often find themselves defending the accused, because their role will be to argue cases that are being appealed on constitutional grounds.

As previously stated, there are many more types of law from which to choose; what you choose will depend upon your present interests and your interests as they develop in law school. There is no reason to make your decision now as to what type of law you will practice; the legal profession changes constantly and you may find your own interests changing as you become exposed to more and more information.

Customers Blue About AmEx Blue Cash Card

Montvale, NJ: When you chose your credit card company, you probably looked at a number of factors, including whether or not the company had a rebate program, before you made your choice. American Express Company offered its customers the Blue Cash Card as one option. The AmEx Blue Cash Card was supposed to give consumers money back based on how much they spend—but customers are now investigating an AmEx lawsuit, alleging the company did not live up to its rebate promises.

Credit Card PurchaseIn the increasing competition to attract consumers to their credit cards, credit card companies have begun offering a wide array of rewards programs linked to their cards. Some offer airline miles, others offer points that can be redeemed for products such as iPods, and still others offer cash back. The goals for all of these programs are to attract customers and, equally important, encourage them to spend on their credit card. After all, a credit card company cannot make money if people do not spend on their card.

However, a lawsuit filed against American Express alleges that the company failed to give consumers cash rebates promised on its Blue Cash Card. Back in September 2003, the card was marketed with the promise that consumers could earn up to 5 percent cash back on purchases made with the Blue Cash Card. What was not made clear was that there were 2 aspects to this Blue Cash rebate, according to the lawsuit.

The first was that consumers would only earn up to 3 percent cash back for purchases made. The second is that consumers would get a 2 percent bonus for carrying a balance on the card. Furthermore, consumers with a balance of over $6,000 got a lesser percentage for purchases up to $6,000. They only actually got the higher percentage when they were over $6,000 and it was only applied to those new purchases. So, someone who spent $7,000 would only get the higher rebate percentage for the additional $1,000. The initial $6,000 would have the lower interest rate applied.

American Express now faces a lawsuit concerning its marketing of the card, alleging the company intentionally gave false and misleading information regarding the rebate program. The suit has been given the green light to go ahead by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, who found that consumers could band together in a class action lawsuit to pursue their claim against the company. The suit seeks to represent consumers who had an AmEx Blue Cash Card between September 2003 and December 2005.

The man who filed the lawsuit says he has not received the benefits he was promised in the marketing of the Blue Cash Card. His words are echoed by other consumers who say they signed up for the card expecting to receive higher rebates than they were actually given.

What is interesting about this lawsuit is that AmEx tried to have it dismissed on the basis of a clause in the customer contract requiring they go through arbitration to settle claims. However, the court found that, because of the amount of money involved in the individual claims, arbitration would be unreasonable for each person to go through, while a class-action lawsuit would provide a forum for customers to be compensated. This opens the door for other class action lawsuits where a company has included an arbitration clause in its contract.

What it means for AmEx customers with the Blue Cash Card is that they may be eligible to join a class action lawsuit against the company to try to recover rebates they say they were promised but never received.

Financial Elder Abuse Victimizes Elder's Grandson

San Jose, CA: J.B. says that he and his grandmother have been victimized by financial abuse. Specifically, his grandmother is a victim of financial elder abuse and this abuse has had a severe impact on J's life, leaving him broke and homeless—living in an extended-stay hotel with the help of a non-profit organization and relying on doctors to provide him with pro bono medical care.

Grandson"I can't access my own money [which is in an insurance policy], but having that money in my name is blocking me from getting benefits and help with an attorney," J says. "Would you believe that a forgery by one person would land someone else homeless on the street?"

J says the situation started when his grandmother decided to buy him and his brother an insurance policy on her life.

"The intent was to give us some of her estate," J says. "But, she was taken advantage of by her insurance agent. She bought a quarter of a million dollar policy death benefit on her life. But here's the thing, my brother and I are owners of this policy—even though we never signed anything to say we would be the owners of the policy. The owner has to sign a piece of paper to acknowledge ownership because there are tax benefits. To simply be a beneficiary, nothing has to be signed. Nothing was sent to me, I was told at the time that I was a beneficiary on the policy. It is common to think that you are the beneficiary and not the owner. That was in 1997 and I was a medical resident at the time.

"In order to get the most commission, the agent had to sell the policy as an estate-planning tool, but Grandma didn't have a big enough estate to need the benefits he was selling. She needed to gift out the maximum amount of the premium every year. She gifted us each $10,000 a year for seven years. We got the money and sent it back to her via the insurance money. We were told that the policy was bought and that was how we would save death taxes. We didn't know that wasn't true. When your grandma does that for you, you say thank you, you don't look into it.

"The insurance agent and Grandma handled all the work. This product, at face value, was not worthless, but Grandma was 73 when she purchased it and she wanted my brother and I to have her money when she died. She is now 86; if she survives 6 years there is no money left and it is worth zero because the premiums go up. But that is not how the policy was sold. She was not told that the death benefit would go down without more premiums put in. We put that $10,000 each in for 7 years, thought that was it and the policy would grow. There was $140,000 put in by the end of that seventh year.

"The owners of a policy are the ones with the contract but the contract was never given to us. None of us knew about this because the contract was sent to Grandma's house. The insurance agent collected the premiums and got first check personally. Grandma paid the first premium and we paid remaining 7 years. There is a lot of intention here for him to cover up so that we would not see the contract until she died. We paid in full, thinking that when she died we would get $250,000. But we really were getting the death benefit, [which may not be equal to $250,000]."

"The insurance agent duped her, took advantage of her and manipulated her, but he didn't take her money, he took ours because she gifted it to us. The insurance agent was scamming an elder. His commission was $22,000 out of $144,000 that was put in.

"I took the papers that I supposedly signed [to become the owner of the policy] to a forgery expert, so I have proof that I didn't sign them.

In 2005, J became sick. He was unable to manage his own affairs and turned control of his assets over to his family, who paid for his health insurance through his assets. His grandmother wanted to help him out financially, so she tried to borrow money from her insurance policy.

"The agent said that she could not borrow the money off the account," J says. "I got suspicious because I knew that if you put $140,000 in the policy and have a cash value account, you should be able to borrow money off the account. I asked about seeing a copy of the policy but the agent wanted nothing to do with that. It took months and then I finally went around him and then went to his company. They finally got back to me that my brother and I needed to sign some papers to release the money.

"We wrote a joint letter [giving their grandmother permission to borrow the money] and we get a letter back saying that the signatures on the letter don't match the signatures on file. How could it not match when we didn't sign anything? I looked at my grandmother's contract and our signatures aren't on the contract. The company said that my brother and I are owners and are in complete control of the policy.

"I didn't know the policy was fraudulent, I was just suspicious."

In the meantime, J continued to struggle with his illness and ran out of money. His employment until he was sick consisted of being trained as a surgeon, which does not count towards SSI benefits, so J applied for disability and multiple doctors stated how severe his illness was. Unfortunately, the life insurance policy J's grandmother took out for him and his brother counted against him. Because J is listed as an owner of the policy, he does not qualify for disability benefits.

"I have nothing. I have been living in my car and my doctor continues to treat me pro bono, even to this day, and helps me get compassionate fills from the pharmacy. I was first denied SSDI in March 2007. A year went by with me fighting the insurance company and they are still ignoring the forgeries. Then, I find out that the policy is dwindling in assets and that the benefits are nothing if she [J's grandmother] survives past a certain age. She bought this as a whole life policy.

"There is $25,000 still in the policy and half is mine, but I have no access because it is jointly owned with my brother. The company knows that the signature was forged because they admit that whoever signed my name also signed my brother's. I was in Thailand when I supposedly signed those papers. So, I have no access to the money, the cash value in the policy is dwindling, and, because I own that life insurance policy—rather than being the beneficiary—I don't qualify for benefits.

"This all started with an insurance agent who wanted a big, fat commission. The insurance company assures my grandmother that when she dies we will get the death benefit—but they don't say we will get $250,000, just that we will get the death benefit. It's tricky wording so you don't know what is going on."

Recovering Your Mutual Fund Losses

Boston, MA: So, you have just received word that your mutual fund losses are staggering. Your fund manager either did not recognize that there were problems with the fund, or did recognize problems but failed to act quickly enough to protect you from further declines in your mutual funds. Luckily, you can count on mutual fund ERISA regulations to help protect your money when your mutual fund manager did not.

Mutual Fund LossIf you are like the average mutual fund investor, you probably are not entirely savvy about the whole mutual fund market. In fact, you may have simply turned your money over to the fund manager and hoped for the best. If so, you are not alone. Many people do not fully understand the ins and outs of investing in mutual funds. Add to that the myriad investing options and there is a lot of information for one person to take in.

After all, you are probably not counting on mutual funds to be your sole source of income. Rather, they are a way for you to save money for your retirement or to pay for your child's education or for some extra money. Your mutual funds are for extra money, but not your main income. You work hard, very hard, for the money that goes into those mutual funds, and you put the money into those mutual funds based on the advice given to you by either your financial advisor or the fund manager.

So, you were stunned to learn that your mutual fund lost as much as it did, especially since you thought you had no reason to worry. You were told that mutual funds were a way for the average person to get involved in investing without all the drama of the stock market (and who needs that up-one-day-down-the-next rollercoaster?). With the mutual fund your money is managed for you, by a professional money manager whose job it is to make sure you get the most from your mutual fund.

Except that sometimes the fund manager fails to act in his clients' best interests. He may make decisions that are based on personal interest or that go against what is prudent for his investors. The problem is that he is playing with other people's money—and those people deserve to have their interests represented.

Your losses may not be the stuff of news headlines, you may not have lost millions of dollars, but you lost money due to someone's negligence and that is unacceptable. You lost more than you could afford to lose—you lost money that was supposed to help you out during retirement. You lost money that you worked hard to save—maybe you budgeted for years so that you would have a few extra pennies to put into your mutual funds. Now you find out that you do not have that money after all.

So, what do you do now? Well, a good place to start would be to contact an attorney to discuss your legal options. A lawyer can help determine if your losses were just an unfortunate result of the economic downturn or if there was actual negligence involved in the managing of your fund. If there was negligence, then you may be able to recover your lost money. It is not the ideal situation to be in, but at least you can recover some of the money that you lost because someone failed to act in your best interests.

US Supreme Court News

Consensus in vogue at high court, so far

By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - Nothing has altered the Supreme Court's pronounced split between its liberal and conservative justices, but more than the half the court's opinions so far this term have been unanimous or with just one dissenting voice.

Court rules for suspect in dispute over confession

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has ruled that confessions obtained by federal authorities before a suspect's first court appearance may be inadmissible if more than six hours elapse between an arrest and a court date.

Court won't hear appeals from Navy chaplains

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has refused to get in the middle of a fight between the Navy and some of its chaplains over complaints that only Catholic chaplains were allowed to stay in the service long enough to get retirement pensions.

Court to decide if good lawyers can get more money

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court will decide whether a judge can award more money to winning lawyers because the judge thought they did a good job. The high court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal from the state of Georgia over attorney fees for lawyers who sued to force dramatic changes in Georgia's foster care system.

High court lets Abu-Jamal's conviction stand

WASHINGTON (AP) - Mumia Abu-Jamal has lost his bid for a new trial in the killing of a Philadelphia police officer in 1981. The Supreme Court said Monday it will not take up Abu-Jamal's claims that prosecutors improperly excluded blacks from the jury that convicted him of murdering Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner.

Top Legal Headlines

Vermont legalizes gay marriage with veto override

By DAVE GRAM Associated Press Writer MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) - Vermont, which invented civil unions, on Tuesday became a pioneer again as the first state to legalize gay marriage through a legislature's vote, suggesting growing popular acceptance of the idea.

Democrat wins Rahm Emanuel's Ill. Congress seat

By DEANNA BELLANDI Associated Press Writer CHICAGO (AP) - Democrat Mike Quigley knows that for at least a little while he'll be known as the guy who replaced Rahm Emanuel, President Barack Obama's chief of staff, in Congress.

Low-key Harley lover running Stevens investigation

By NEDRA PICKLER Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - The investigation into whether prosecutors broke the law in pursuing their case against former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens is being led by a Harley-riding attorney known for his low-key style and experience on both sides of criminal law.

Report: Treasury may extend TARP to life insurers

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) - The U.S. Treasury Department plans to extend the Troubled Asset Relief Program to certain life insurers, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. The announcement is expected within the next several days, The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.

SEC is floating options to limit short sales

By MARCY GORDON AP Business Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal regulators are floating several options for reining in the practice of short-selling stocks, as investors, corporations and lawmakers clamor for restrictions on moves they say gutted vulnerable companies and worsened the market's downward spiral.


Insurance Investigations - Legal Investigators

Nationwide
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Background Checks - Legal Investigators

Nationwide
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Medical & Surgical - Expert Witnesses

Appraisal Services - Expert Witnesses

Accident & Injury - Expert Witnesses

Director of FBI Urges Renewal of Patriot Act

Portions of Law to Expire This Year


FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III called parts of the Patriot Act
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III called parts of the Patriot Act "exceptional." (Dennis Cook - AP)

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III urged lawmakers yesterday to renew intelligence-gathering measures in the USA Patriot Act that are set to expire in December, calling them "exceptional" tools to help protect national security.

The law, passed shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, created divisions between proponents, who said it was necessary to deter terrorism, and privacy advocates warning that it tramples on Americans' civil liberties. Portions of the law are up for reauthorization this year.

Mueller told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee he hopes that the reauthorization of two provisions would be far less controversial than in previous years. One of those provisions, which helps authorities secure access to business records, "has been exceptionally helpful in our national security investigations," he said.

In response to a question from Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.), Mueller said that his agents had used the provision about 220 times between 2004 and 2007. Data for last year were not yet available, he said.

The measure allows investigators probing terrorism to seek a suspect's records from third parties such as financial services and travel and telephone companies without notifying the suspect. The American Civil Liberties Union has criticized the provision, saying it violates the First Amendment rights of U.S. citizens.

Another provision, permitting roving wiretaps of terrorism suspects, was used 147 times and has helped eliminate "an awful lot of paperwork," Mueller said. In the past, authorities had to seek court approval for each electronic device carried by a suspect, from a cellphone and a BlackBerry to a home computer. But under the provision, one warrant can cover all of those machines.

The ACLU issued a report this month describing "widespread abuse" of government authority under the Patriot Act.

"The Patriot Act has been disastrous for Americans' rights," said Caroline Frederickson, the director of the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office. "Congress should use this year's Patriot Act reauthorization as an opportunity to reexamine all of our surveillance laws."

Agents' use of the Patriot Act and other sensitive investigative tools has been a source of friction between FBI officials and Democratic lawmakers.

Mueller said he has not had a chance to meet with new Justice Department or White House officials regarding their views on the Patriot Act. But at the Senate confirmation hearing for Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in January, Mueller expressed at least moderate support for renewing the provisions that will sunset in December.

David Kris, an expert on intelligence laws, won unanimous Senate confirmation yesterday as the new leader of the Justice Department's National Security Division. He will play an important role in the Patriot Act reauthorization and in supervising the FBI's national security operations.

"It is important that [Congress] examine more specifics," Cardin told the FBI director. "We want to make sure you have the tools that you need and that you have appropriate oversight. There may need to be modifications . . . a fine-tuning of these provisions to make sure they are effective and used as intended by Congress."

USA Law Full List A - Z